|

Go To Webtrading.com Home-Page
ALS - Phantom, your required rules seem pretty simple. Let's
use some practical applications in real time trading.
POP - In trading, rules are not meant to be broken for your own sake. The
rules bring you to a no judgement type approach. You design your trade program
and approach to trading by keeping the major choice of positions within your
program while keeping the confirmation to the market. Your only job is to
follow your trade program while obeying rules one and two. The rules take away
the need to decide while the market is open of what to do during the trade day.
You will have a good idea what you expect of yourself at all times rather
than guessing what is actually going to take place with your positions. You
will either be proven correct with your positions or you simply get out of the
positions. You don't stick around to get hurt with exposure if the market is
not proving you correct.
Yes, you will have exceptions when the rules don't corporate with you and
what the markets are doing. This will be a minimum problem, as the rules will
keep you in the trading game for long term trading.
You must research your trade program well enough to be able to not enter at
bad entry levels. Even if you make a simple mistake such as chasing markets,
rule one will still keep you from excessive drawdown during your trading
career.
ALS - I notice a few questions coming up about excessive commissions when
using rule one!
POP - Today as an example as I bought the DJIA after a 30 point rise and
expected to see a 5 point plus within 30 seconds. After 30 seconds I bailed. I
had a loss of one point on the trade. The market continued to drop against me
and my loss would have been 30-40 times my commission even if I had paid top
commission at the low point.
Now you can't tell me that it is better to stay in and wait for it to come
back then it is to get out and re-evaluate the situation. In the end I would
have been right but my mental standing after a simple rule one trade is a lot
better and allows me to have sanity about my next move.
Most traders think it is bad for them to be wrong and when they are, that's
it for the day. Well, being wrong is the best chance to put a correct position
on with your next trade as you certainly can trade again.
If you keep a trade, which never proves to be correct within your program of
time element, you will never be able to correct a bad situation but only be
able to remove that bad situation. Your mental well being is worth a lot in
trading. You can trade well when you are thinking good.
What I am going to say next is something usually learned not by observation
but by making the assumption itself. Most of your money from trading is going
to come from trades, which take off rather quickly from when you put them on.
That is the reason rule two is so important. Just look at most starting trends
and good runs you have once a market turns. The chop-chop markets aren't going
to give you good income.
While it is true that being in control of your position in the market rather
than the market being in control of what you are going to think about your
position next simplifies your trading life, it also greatly enhances your
ability to make good trades. The main reason is that you know what to expect
and have those expectations up front from the entry of your trades.
If you supervise a house building and you have several trades working on the
house, you certainly make sure the plumbing which goes in the foundation is
being put in correctly before you walk away and let the foundation be
completed. Building a position is the same in trading as most occupations. If
the plumbing and foundation on the house are completed correctly, you move to
the next step.
Still at any time the prior work finished could create a problem. Let's say
the foundation settles and cracks the sewer pipe. Would you continue on the
house? Of course you wouldn't. Well no way will you continue with a trade,
which proved correct but now shows problems.
You can never let your guard down in trading. You must always know what the
next step is for you in any situation. You rehearse your criteria of a trade
and it becomes second nature. Just like driving a car becomes sub conscience to
you when you are proficient at it.
You start out by not knowing what the trade will ever do when you put it on.
You can never control what the market will do or how the orders will enter the
pits. You can not tell me when a large fund is going to take a profit or enter
a new position. Nor can anyone else tell you for certain. All you can do is
build your criteria or trade plan to take every angle which is important into
account.
I can give you a plan, which will catch every move, but you will catch
moves, which are the wrong way too. Along with that plan to never miss a move I
can give you the big drawdown and the rules which will eat you alive if you
can't afford the drawdown. In the end you will have what you think is a very
small profit for all your time and patience of going along with the plan.
But yes, you will have a profit. That is not what the usual trader is about.
He is not in this game to earn a few extra bucks for his vacation. He is always
after a better return then most would consider fair in any other investment.
That reason is another creator of rule one.
You are expecting a big reward and fail to see the big risk, which faces you
at first. Somewhere along the way you must face the situation for what it is.
Trading is a loser's game. You must learn how to lose. The biggest loser who
loses small will continue in the game. Obviously the small trader who loses big
will quickly go to the sidelines. Sometimes the sidelines are not even there
for a few.
Their losses take away their hearts. Believe me for I have seen them. It is
the saddest thing in the world to take away someone's dream. More so when they
never knew the enemy in the first place. A trader must know and accept what the
market can do along the damage side to equity, to mental peace and to
self-esteem. Every day is a big surprise in trading.
You must plan for the surprise from the time you put your position in place.
The big surprise can sometimes be a friend but you must be prepared for it.
Why do I say the market is going to give you a surprise? Can you tell me
exactly how far a market will move and then re-trace before continuing or if it
will continue?
What you can do is to eliminate your reactions to what the market does to
you. You do this by not giving the market the power to control your position or
emotions with adverse market moves. You start out expecting the adverse market
moves and plan your action based on those outcomes.
When you place a trade, don't ever think this is the only trade to make.
There are thousands of trades you can make. You aren't going to miss a move for
long if you trade correctly. You aren't going to chase markets if you trade
correctly. You must have a plan to enter positions based on each market's
criteria. Rule one is the rule, which keeps you in control at all times when
that position is in place.
Behavior modification can take place in many forms but you need a rule to show
you what must be done at all times. One trader suggested the rubber band
method. Each time you took a big loss or did some bad trading you would snap
the rubber band on your wrist. That's if you remembered to do it.
I don't like this method but it is better than a lot of others. Just because
you put on a trade, which lost money, is no reason to feel bad. If you put a
position on and lost big money that is when you can feel very bad. With rule
one you are freeing yourself from having to feel bad.
You put the trade on based on the trade plan. The market either confirms and
you now have a good position or it doesn't confirm and you are not ok with the
position and you get out. Simple! Only a big deal if you don't get out when it
isn't confirmed a good position. No need to ever feel bad. Most of your trades,
which don't confirm within a logical time frame, are usually going to look bad
sooner or later. Why not take the sooner?
ALS - It's beginning to look like it takes more thought to put a trade on
then the time you're going to be in it if you're wrong or I mean not proven to
be in a correct position!
POP - The logical step is to have the plan in place for the next step before
you put on the trade. I would guess that 95 per-cent of the traders put the
trade on and then wait for the market to prove they have a bad position. Even
if the position is correct, their next step is wondering when to get out. .
It's human nature to do it their way. It causes a lot of unsuspecting reactions
in their lives.
ALS - Human nature is as you say. I know you did some research on human nature
of traders and non-traders. Perhaps we can talk about some of your data.
POP - I'll tell you what I would prefer to do. It would be better to just
suggest some of the experiments and let the readers come to their own
conclusions. Let's keep that in the behavior modification tips.
ALS - There were some questions on when to get out of a position. I realize
this is out of order here but I know we need to include rule two.
POP - That's ok as it is a common question as to when do you know when to
get out of a position. Actually rule two addresses this very well because it
says to press your winners correctly without exception. Rather than getting out
of a position with the proper criteria you will be increasing your position.
You only do the adding with correctly proven positions.
The time to get out of a position is not when the market is proving your
position to be a correct one. You have the opportunity to be wrong as often as
correct but when you are already proven correct, this is certainly the time to
step off of first base.
We have two rules to keep us protected from our lack of certainty and
enforcement of certainty. Many trading plans have the trader in a position at
all times. The thinking being that the market is either going to go up or go
down. Well this is just absolutely an idiot's plan. Maybe I shouldn't say it so
strong as I should have an open mind still.
I have to put this in the category of thinking a statement, which says to
not do something, actually says to do the opposite of that statement. Too many
times I have watched a fund bid the market so they can sell the market. It's a
plan to take advantage of the surprise element in the markets. There was the
day when you would only see me on both sides only when I was wrong. I am wrong
a lot more lately. That's not bad either!
The readers are surely asking by now how do we use these two rules? It's
easier to use real time quotes and markets to prove the points but since we
only have hindsight here, we will do it differently. Let's use the old common
day trading technique, which I am not going to give you judgment on at this
time.
You say your plan wants you long if you take out the opening range! Ok let
us say we are trading onions and the price is 1000($10). The price goes to 1001
and the opening range was 999-1000. Your plan says buy so you buy. You get
filled at 1002! Why 1002? Well execution is getting the position filled! You
gave up a slip of 1 tick. Not bad, most of the time it is small.
We can go into the importance of execution now or continue the trade. Let us
continue the nature of the trade and cover the importance of execution later.
Now that you are long at 1002 you are using rule one. You assume this is a bad
trade until the market proves to you that the trade is good. If the market does
not prove this a good trade you are going to exit the trade. Fine so far!
What criteria in your day trading plan says you are right. Most say what
determines you are wrong. Not us! We only want to know the criteria for being
right. Ok for us our program says "if in the first half hour, the market
opens lower than yesterday and moves higher, expect a move above the prior
day's high within the first half day of trading."
Our program also says the position is only correct if the market stays in
the prior days top half in the first half hour. Our last criteria for the trade
is that it must show a 3 point profit by the close. Now I ask you what is your
next step?
Your criteria for remaining in this position is only when the requirements
of your data indicate to you the position is correct. The other data you would
need in the program is yesterday's range, yesterdays high and yesterdays close.
Your day trading program says to use the old rule of opening range break out.
Yesterday's data is critical in knowing when you are correct.
For our example we will use yesterday's high as 997 and yesterday's range as
991-997. It gets interesting here because you are going to decide whether you
will exit the position. At the end of 30 minutes the market is at 997. What
would you do?
The first criterion of our trade program is in conflict with your day
trading strategy but you still bought the opening range break out. We don't
care if the two are in conflict! We only care what causes our position to be
correct. Ok so far.
The market has been open a half hour and our price is 997. As you can see
you must know your trade plan before the market opens and what you are required
to do. What makes your position correct? You must be in yesterday's top half
range after the first half hour of trading.
Are you indeed in the top half range from yesterday?
I am going to give you the answer indirectly so you can't slip down to find
it. We will go to the next step here. At the end of the first half day of
trading the price is 996. Are you still in the position? You did take out the
prior day's high but you didn't open lower. Ok we still did it! Stayed in first
half hour. That's right.
Now first half day price is down to 996 and we bought at 1002. Still in the
top half of yesterday's range. Ok, we are still in the position. Bad entry
though as our plans conflicted. Should have only taken the position if it
opened lower. It didn't. Well ok because we are day traders we used the opening
range break out. Our entry wasn't the best but so what!
At the end of the day the market is at 992. Are we still in the position?
You have the right answer but Why? The market had to be at 1005 in order to
keep the position. It had to show a 3 point profit on the close.
How would you get out of this position? You would have used a stop close
only order after the first half day to sell the position 1004 stop close only.
The example gives you several interesting situations and perhaps just as
many questions about rule one. Rule one will not protect you from wrong
entries! That is your job. You must solve your own conflicts in your trading.
Rule one did take you out of the trade on the close because you were not proven
correct based on the required criteria.
Keep in mind this example is a very different situation than you would
expect of your trading program. You can't have a program which says if the
market doesn't go to 980 that it looks for the market to go to 1100 sometime.
There has to be a time frame on when they expect 1100. When a market doesn't go
up anymore, somewhere it isn't correct to stay in the position regardless of
the expectations.
The market must prove and continue to prove. It can be simple or complex
strategies in your program but when the position is not doing according to the
expectations it is wrong. Not when it proves your stop price got hit.
Stops, yes we did use a stop to get out. We did not use the stop as the
criteria for getting out. The stop did not prove us wrong but the criteria
proved us wrong.
I realize that in the example we put conflict, various criteria which was
required for the position to be correct and a bad entry example. Does this
point out more than just rule one to you? Rule one will get you out of a
position which is not proven correct but it won't fix a bad entry. Know your
plan before the market opens! If you had known your plan in this example prior
to opening, you would have never positioned.
ALS - Ok, I see your point but how can most traders with jobs trade as the
example shows?
POP - I can give you other examples but it all comes down to the criteria
for proving a position correct. If you trade by looking in the newspaper each
night your trading plan will be different and your positions must be smaller as
you are going to need wider ranges to work with on criteria.
In the above example you could never have placed the order to buy the
opening range break out and therefore it would never have been in your plans.
You may have had criteria which said to buy yesterdays low plus one tick or two
ticks and a time of day order which said TOD10:00a.m. sell 993 stop.
The market would have to be in the bottom half after first half hour to get
out as criteria indicated to be correct the market had to be in top half range
after first half hour. The other criteria could be met with either OCO (one
cancels other) orders or stop limit close only orders. Not all brokers take all
orders so your plan must include this possibility of difficulty in trading.
Each tool you lose or don't have in trading, you must reduce your position
accordingly to have an effective long range program. The farther away you are
from all the tools you need, the wider road you must have. Reduce the size of
your car (position) for the road that isn't wider.
Now that we have your attention I think it is clear to see how just two
simple rules can be exploited. You can't help but understand why trading can be
so difficult. You want to be a knowledgeable trader and you need to take all of
the difficulty out of your daily trading when the market is closed.
ALS - I would like to ask you a question, which I have wondered over the
past couple of decades. Do you fell when you take a position you have taken a
good position?
POP - Never! Do you understand my NO? If at any time a trader thinks they
have what is a very good trade, they are going to get removed from trading very
quickly. I make the best trade on my trade probabilities program but who is to
say my guess is better than someone else's is? Never do I know it is a good
trade until it proves to be.
Understanding that to feel you are making a good trade is signing your death
warrant in trading. The majority of traders do certainly feel that they have a
good handle and they are only putting on good trades.
There is an old saying that the market is never wrong. I don't mean to
protest directly but I think that is not always the case. But it is what we
must trade by in price. Markets go to extremes and that is certainly in
challenge in always being right. Once we know markets go to extremes, we can
put that on our side and exploit the advantage.
Very few traders exploit that advantage. You must with rule two press your
winners. Often times you won't understand the importance of pressing the
winners but it makes no difference as to reason when you collect your profits.
Who really cares if the market is or isn't always correct. The market price is
what we are measuring our equity with and always will.
In trading nothing goes right for most traders unless they take total
control of positioning and letting the market only prove when a position is
correct. I know I am repeating myself but there is not better way to impress
this information upon the readers of this insight.
I don't want to see any small traders wiped off the map when it comes to
trading but that is what happens to most of them. They are small and are
stopped by the big traders and funds most of the time. If they can understand
the urgency of not letting the big trades ruin their plans and hopes, they will
do much better.
The first step is what we are pointing out. I know because I have driven the
big cars on the small tracks. It is better to drive the small car on the big
track but it just never comes out the same. With a little understanding we
shall change that for them.
ALS - I remember an experiment which proved very successful with a group of
traders or would be traders. Do you foresee that situation again.
POP - I have no idea of what you are talking about! I wish them well. No, I
think an individual is the best minority of one I have ever hoped to reward.
Only one at a time in trading is fine with me. It is their dream and my
reality. They have to make it happen. If it doesn't, don't blame the messenger.
Look in the mirror.
ALS - You and I are traders not writers, doesn't it seem strange to you to
bring foreword your thoughts on trading for others to read?
POP - You may end up a better writer than you think. It's perfect as the
best time to learn about trading is when the market is closed. Most traders
only learn when the market is open and what a mistake that can be. It can be
costly and emotional. Both are wrong sides of the coin.
ALS - We need some examples of other questions which the traders and readers
will have on rule two. When do we press a winner and when do we get out of our
winners.
POP - I know they would like for me to say this is the plan and it is very
simple. I can't say that as it takes work, experience and execution at all
times. Most traders, I don't mean to group them so severely and handicap them,
but true as it is they look to remove their positions just as soon as they
prove them right. They forget what their true purpose in trading really is. It
is to not only make as much money as possible but it most important is to make
it in the least amount of time.
This keeps them from facing the problem of drawdown because they are not
trading to face drawdown but only to trade to make money.
I will never forget my Mother's words when I was honest with her on a trade
one day. She asked how I did the day she visited the exchange. I said I lost a
large sum of money. Well, her remark was "I wouldn't have done that!"
I didn't attend to my business that day and left a trade on. You don't do that.
But that is just what traders do everyday. They leave trades on when their
Mother visits!
Believe me, Your mother will visit you every day when you trade! You have to
attend to your job of cutting losses.
Just a couple of days ago, I was asked to go out on a nice boat trip for
five days. It is costly if you don't attend to your affairs. There are times
you must above all else attend to your positions. There are no long term
trades! Only trades which turn into long term held positions.
Don't ever let anyone tell you that they have a long term position on at any
time. How do they know? How does anyone know? Only the market can tell you and
it opens every trading day. Don't ask me what I think. It doesn't matter. I can
only give you the best odds. It is up to you to believe what the market is
telling you.
ALS - How about rule two?
POP - What can I say other than let set an example up. Ok today let us say
beans opened at 85-88 and after he first half hour 85 was still the low but 90
was the high. What would you do if it was 15 higher at 88 and you put your
position yesterday? Would you get out and take your profits, take half your
profits or add to the position?
I will tell you what most will do. They will take all of their profits. That
is when you know your position was proven correct again from yesterday. What do
you think the correct answer is?
You must use rule two. You certainly don't reverse pyramid by putting the
same or bigger positions on because the market could very well take out the
lows quickly and you will have to salvage what you increased if wrong. Do it in
smaller numbers. Your plan must tell you when you know what you did yesterday
is confirmed ok that you must increase your position somewhere along the line.
Sure, the argument is, but I am not sure it will keep going up. So what? We
never really do anyway. So what is different about going with the current
certainty? As long as you have rule one it makes no difference if you are wrong
because you have all the doors covered. Don't ever lose sight of rule one when
using rule two.
Some traders will say that they don't really know where to put the trade on
price wise. Yes, you do! The word E X E C U T I O N means make sure you
guarantee you have that added position. There are times when execution is the
most important aspect of a trade. If you can't get a position on you sure can't
take on off. I know you have heard that statement in the past but it is with
good foundation. You must say at the market in those situations.
Ok, today we pointed out a situation where it was obvious to add. Looking
back it is always obvious. What matters is that after enough lead on your
position after you have put some time between the position and an advantage
price of a little magnitude, you must be pretty sure it's time to take your
profit.
Well, don't take your profit. Add to your position. Then if it doesn't prove
correct, take your remaining profit and expect to re-enter at a different
level. So what if you lose a few ticks because you put an added position on and
it was wrong! You will get enough lead on adds that you won't ever think twice
after you see the run-a-way markets!
It's isn't because I say so but because the market catches traders the wrong
way. It is seldom that it's not the case.
When a market gaps higher or lower, you are in a position to take the profit
takers position away from them. Do it, but use rule one when you do. That way
you will never worry if you are in a correct position or not. Doesn't matter
anyway because with your rule one, you will do the right thing. It is never bad
to be wrong. Only then can you benefit when you are correct.
Most traders will make a trade and lose a good amount and miss the next
trade. Out of step with the market is bad and it gets worse. Don't get out of
cadence for long on any one trade. That way you can half step right back in
line.
ALS - Phantom, you are acting as if everyone can do what you explained.
POP - Not everyone can do what they must do. Learn what you are capable of
doing and stick to those parameters. Use the protection rules in your
parameters. Don't modify them or misunderstand them for your own satisfaction.
Use them as they were meant to be used. They will hurt you if you don't use
them correctly.
ALS - We could use more examples of how to use your rules but I feel the
readers will get a little overwhelmed if we continue to throw examples at them.
We could address every situation and eliminate most of the required
interpretation by the traders. I don't think we should do that at this time.
POP - Yes, I totally agree, as the integrity of a subject is not always how
well it is presented but how well, in this case, it is impressed upon traders.
It is up to the trader to fully comprehend their part of what is required of
themselves. They can make mistakes but as long as they use the rules properly,
they will stay in the game.
It is a fine line when creating a program to trade markets. I have always
suggested they establish their own criteria based on the best knowledge they
can find. You start with point and figure charting to understand the
characteristics of your market. Even if it is someone else's chart, you must
see what the market is capable of doing to traders.
I am not saying that there aren't good trade programs but only that the
trader must fully understand where the criteria in these programs are
establishing the entries and exits. These programs will never have rules one
and two in them so you will have to incorporate them which could void the
program. So be careful and express your concern with the program vendor on
these matters. Your concern is to keep your drawdown within reason to allow you
to trade forever.
Art, have we covered it yet?
ALS - Never in a thousand books can we cover it completely but I think we
have made our point and you have made your mark on the readers thinking.
" You can trade well when you are thinking good.
"
---POP
TOP OF PAGE

Go To Webtrading.com Home-Page
|